Legal Opinion

Nestucca Wagon Road Co. v. Landingham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Tillamook County: Geo. H. Burnett, Judge. Motion to dismiss an appeal.

1Per curiam

The record discloses that on the tenth of September, 1892, plaintiff served a notice of appeal on the defendant, and on the sixteenth of the same month perfected the appeal by filing an undertaking as provided by law, but neglected to file the transcript in this court until after the second day of the October term, or to obtain an order enlarging the time, for which reason the appeal was, on the twenty-fifth of January, 1893, dismissed. While the first appeal was pending and undisposed of, the plaintiff prepared and served a new notice of appeal, and filed a new undertaking, and, after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelley v. PikeOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McCarty v. WintlerOregon Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McKinney v. NaybergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hanley v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Davidson v. Columbia Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API