Legal Opinion

Lindblom v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2019No. 1:15-cv-00990Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APRIL LINDBLOM, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00990-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AS OF RIGHT 13 v. (Doc. No. 164) 14 SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 15 Defendant. SUBSTITUTE CLASS REPRESENTATIVE 16 (Doc. No. 156) 17 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY 18 APPEAL 19 (Doc No. 177) 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Currently before the Court are a Motion for Leave to Intervene as of Right filed by Jason 22 Crowley, Juanita Garcia, and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Jackson v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API