Legal Opinion

Fijal v. Anderson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 28, 2000No. 98-P-1825PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, by electing to file his contract claim against the defendant under the small claims procedure in a District Court, waived, by the express terms of G. L. c. 218, § 23, second par., his right to a jury trial and to any appeal from any adverse ruling to the District Court jury-of-six session; and by the terms of § 23, tenth par., any right to a report to the appellate division of the District Court department. He implicitly waived any right of appeal to the Appeals Court because this court generally has jurisdiction over District Court civil appeals only from final decisions of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Walker v. Board of Appeals of HarwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Jones v. MannsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Pandey v. Ware Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Bischof v. KernMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Amari v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Davis, Malm & D'Agostine v. LahnstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Tessema v. Nextel Systems Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Norfolk Financial Corp. v. WynnMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API