Amari v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
Pursuant to G.L.c. 218, §23, the trial court has reported for our review the propriety of its denial of the plaintiffs motions to transfer two related small claims actions to the regular civil docket.
In each action, the plaintiff, a chiropractor, alleged that the defendant, an insurance company, failed to pay him Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits under G.L.c. 90, §34M for medical services rendered. The two separate actions involved medical treatment provided to two different patients. In each case, the plaintiff sought attorney’s fees and costs under §34M; and multiple damages,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Travis v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Provenzano v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009