Bischof v. Kern
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
Because the plaintiff, also defendant in counterclaim, believed that his landlord wrongfully held his security deposit in violation of G. L. c. 186, § 15, he opted, pro se, for the “simple, prompt, and informal means, at small expense, for adjudication of [his] claim[j” in the small claims session of the Boston Municipal Court. McLaughlin v. Levenbaum, 248 Mass. 170, 175-176 (1924). See G. L. c. 218, §§ 21-25. The defendant, seeking three months of rent in damages for the plaintiffs alleged breach of his written lease of the apartment, filed a counterclaim as permitted by Uniform Small Claims…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Spence v. ReederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Mclaughlin v. LevenbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fijal v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Stevenson v. MackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Most v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Medeiros v. Marisqueira Madeira, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Mullane v. Barclays Bank Del.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.