Legal Opinion

Bischof v. Kern

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 23, 1992No. 91-P-419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

Because the plaintiff, also defendant in counterclaim, believed that his landlord wrongfully held his security deposit in violation of G. L. c. 186, § 15, he opted, pro se, for the “simple, prompt, and informal means, at small expense, for adjudication of [his] claim[j” in the small claims session of the Boston Municipal Court. McLaughlin v. Levenbaum, 248 Mass. 170, 175-176 (1924). See G. L. c. 218, §§ 21-25. The defendant, seeking three months of rent in damages for the plaintiffs alleged breach of his written lease of the apartment, filed a counterclaim as permitted by Uniform Small Claims…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Spence v. ReederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Mclaughlin v. LevenbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fijal v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Stevenson v. MackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Most v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Medeiros v. Marisqueira Madeira, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
  5. Mullane v. Barclays Bank Del.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API