Legal Opinion

Shriners Hospitals for Children v. Woods

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 2016No. CV07110578; A155952Published

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

In this garnishment proceeding, defendant Woods appeals an order that disbursed to others a money award that he was to receive from a legal malpractice action. Plaintiffs, Shriners Hospitals for Children and Oregon Scottish Rite Clinics (together, Shriners), sought to garnish the malpractice award to collect on a default judgment against Woods. Woods’s first assignment of error asserts that the trial court erred when it denied his ORCP 71 B(l)(d) motion to set aside Shriners’ default judgment from an earlier proceeding. He contends that failure of service of summons and complaint precluded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. In re the Marriage of WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API