Legal Opinion
Capitol Castings, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 26, 1992No. 1 CA-UB 90-051 to 1 CA-UB 90-064PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Judge.
This case arose when an employer closed one of its plants and chose to pay laid-off employees their usual salaries for 60 days after their last day of work rather than provide the 60-day notice of plant closing required by the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2101-09 (1989) (WARN). 1 The issue is whether the payments to the employees constitute “wages” for purposes of state unemployment compensation benefits. See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-622.A (1990). We conclude the payments are not wages and therefore affirm the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Gaskin v. WaylandArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Metro Mobile Cts, Inc. Metro Mobile Cts of Phoenix, Inc. v. Newvector Communications, Inc., and Newvector Retail Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Metro Mobile CTS, Inc. v. Newvector Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1987
- State, Dept. of Indus. Relations v. DeslattesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Baca v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.