Legal Opinion

Gaskin v. Wayland

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1944No. Civil No. 4598PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Superior Judge.

From a judgment in favor of the Commission, the defendants Gaskin and Bradley appeal.

This case was submitted to the lower court on an agreed statement of facts. Briefly, they are as follows :

The appellants here, defendants below, were in the business of policing certain merchants’ property in Phoenix, Arizona. A contract of hire was entered into between appellants and the City of Phoenix and another contract between appellants and their patrolmen.. The plaintiffs, the appellees here, brought suit for taxes accrued on the salaries, wages or payments that were paid to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Capitol Castings, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Dearing v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API