Legal Opinion
Sioux Falls School District v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1993No. 18105PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Justice.
The Sioux Falls School District appeals a circuit court decision affirming the South Dakota Department of Commerce and Regulation, Division of Insurance which denied a claim against the South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund. We affirm.
FACTS
The South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) is a fund created under South Dakota worker’s compensation law to encourage employers to hire or retain disabled or handicapped workers. See generally 2 Larson, Worker’s Compensation Law, § 59.30 (1992). When a previously injured employee sustains additional injury, an employer may receive…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DarbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.