Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C.P.R. Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 10, 1984No. CA A28934; 81-7-815 - CA A28976; 81-7-816 - CA A28986; 81-7-817 - CA A28977; 81-7-818 - CA A28987; 81-7-819 - CA A28978; 81-7-820 - CA A28979; 81-7-821 - CA A28988; 81-7-822 - CA A28989; 81-7-823 - CA A28990; 81-7-824 - CA A28980; 6829 - CA A28971; 6830 - CA A28981; 6831 - CA A28973; 6832 - CA A28972; 6833 - CA A28982; 6834 - CA A28983; 6835 - CA A28974; 6836 - CA A28984; 6837 - CA A28985; 6838 - CA A28975Published
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
In these twenty consolidated cases, plaintiff sought to foreclose certain real estate mortgages. The mortgagors were originally named as parties. They defaulted and are not parties to this appeal. Defendants Choy and Wong entered into contracts to purchase the real estate from the mortgagors.1 They appeal from a judgment that specifically enforced a settlement agreement entered into by the parties’ attorneys and awarded plaintiff attorney fees, expenses and costs. Because this is an equitable proceeding we review de novo 2 ORS 19.125(3). We affirm.
After defendants were served with summonses…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Johnson v. TeskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Hiransomboon v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Galbraith v. Monarch Gold Dredging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938