Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Monarch Gold Dredging Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The circuit court on May 24, 1938, upon the written consent of the attorney for defendant entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, John W. Galbraith and Eliza Ray Galbraith, and against the defendant, Monarch Gold Dredging Company, in the sum of $4,751.73, together with interest thereon at 6 per cent per annum from December 3, 1936, and the further sum of $474.41 as costs, being the full amount asked by the plaintiffs in their complaint. Thereafter, on June 24, 1938, the defendant filed a motion to have the judgment set aside on the ground that the defendant’s attorney had no authority to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ohlquest v. Farwell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Hallack v. LoftSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Precious v. O'RourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Johnson v. TeskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Detroit Vapor Stove Co. v. J. C. Weeter Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C.P.R. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Johnson v. TeskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API