Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tesky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1982No. 34505, CA 19408PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*135WARREN, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages which she suffered in a motor vehicle accident allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence. In her supplemental answer, defendant contends that a settlement agreement was entered into between the attorneys for the parties and that plaintiff is bound by that agreement. The trial court determined, in a separate proceeding, that plaintiff had not authorized her attorneys to settle and that her claim could, therefore, go to trial. Plaintiff was awarded $55,000 in the subsequent jury trial. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff and defendant were involved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. NunleyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cohen v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
  3. Miotk v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  4. Folsom v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Minniti v. Cascade Emp. Ass'n, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New England Educational Training Service, Inc. v. Silver Street PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cook v. Surety Life Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Free v. Wilmar J. Helric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API