Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Drainage District No. 8
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court in the sum of $58.29 for damages sustained by it by reason of defendants cutting its telephone wires. These wires were strung at proper height on poles along a public road which intersected the defendants’ drainage ditch.
Defendants assumed to act under Road and Bridge Act, passed by the Legislature in 1917. [See Session Acts 1917, pages 480, 481, and section 3326, R. S. 1909, now sections 10737 to 10741, inclusive, R. S. 1919.] Defendants gave required notice under such law to plaintiff to remove its wires and poles, which plaintiff refused to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deiner v. SutermeisterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Lyons v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Bruntmeyer v. Squaw Creek Drainage District No. 1Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- State v. MaurerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Heman Construction Co. v. LyonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Millhouse v. Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. BrandstetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- City of Salinas v. Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- State ex rel. Rybolt v. EasleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980