Legal Opinion

City of Salinas v. Telephone & Telegraph Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1946No. Civ. 12898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

This appeal was taken from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.

The complaint alleges that on May 2, 1891, the city granted a twenty-five year franchise to the predecessor of the respondent; that on November 6, 1916, that franchise was renewed for another twenty-five years, and the latter term expired on December 6, 1941. It also alleges that since that expiration the respondent has not procured from the city any further franchise and now operates and maintains its telephone system and facilities in Salinas without any…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Richmond v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Petaluma v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Snowden v. Kittitas County School District No. 401Washington Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API