Legal Opinion
Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 5, 2009No. C-04-01830 JCS; Docket 699, 710, 712, 714, 716PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In its complaint, Plaintiff Funai Electric Company, Ltd. (“Funai”) alleged that various Daewoo entities infringed the following six patents: 1) United States Patent No. 6,021,018 (“'018 patent”); 2) United States Patent No. 6,064,538 (“'538 patent”); 3) United States Patent No. RE37,332 (“'332 patent”); 4) United States Patent No. 6,421,210 (“'210 patent”); 5) United States Patent No. 5,815,218 (“'218 patent”), and 6) United States Patent No. 5,987,209 (“'209 patent”). Two Daewoo entities, Daewoo…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Funai Electric Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Polara Engineering, Inc. v. Campbell Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Kayser v. McClaryDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2012
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.