Legal Opinion
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 19, 2011No. C.A. 04-1371-LPSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STARK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two post-trial motions: (1) Fairchild’s motion to amend the findings of fact pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 (D.I. 766); and (2) Power’s motion to declare that this case is exceptional and award Power attorneys’ fees and treble damages (D.I. 752). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Fairchild’s motion and grant in part and deny in part Power’s motion.
I. Factual Background and Procedural Posture
For purposes of these motions, the Court will not engage in a lengthy recital of the facts of the case. These…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Pharmacy Corporation of America v. AskariDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.