Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*1017ORDER RE: WILLFULNESS AND ENHANCED DAMAGES
Re: Dkt. Nos, 2186, 2191
LUCY H.' KOH, United States District Judge
On May 5, 2014, after a thirteen-day trial and approximately four days of deliberation, a jury in this patent case reached a verdict, which included a finding of willful infringement'of one of Apple’s patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,046,721 (the “ ’72l patent”). ECF No. 1884.' On May 23, 2014, Samsung filed a motion for judgment as:a matter of law and motion to amend the judgment. ECF No. 1896-3. On September 9, 2014, thé Court granted in part and denied in part Samsung’s motion for judgment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Techtronic Indus. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Canon, Inc. v. Color Imaging, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- EKO Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enters., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Acantha LLC v. DePuy Synthes Sales IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.