Legal Opinion

Taken v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1997No. 96-6312PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWNES, District Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in defendant’s favor on their claims of race and sex discrimination brought pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e through 2000e-17. See Taken v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm’n, 934 F.Supp. 1294 (W.D.Okla.1996). Plaintiffs, who are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Douglas M. Mills v. Health Care Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Stover v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Miscellaneous Docket 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Dick v. Phone Directories Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API