Legal Opinion

Siegal v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 14, 1997No. 95-726CPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge:

This civilian pay action is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff, Phillip Ronald Siegal, seeks retroactive reclassification of his position to a higher grade and related emoluments. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was filed on March 11, 1996. Plaintiff filed his response in opposition to defendant’s motion accompanied by plaintiffs motion to transfer on March 15, 1996, to which defendant filed no…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Spencer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Reeves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Aaron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API