Legal Opinion

People v. Logan

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1899No. Crim. No. 479PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant has been convicted of the crime of rape, and now appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is first claimed that the evidence is too weak to support the verdict of the jury. If the evidence of the prosecuting witness be true, the verdict has full support therein, and its truth or falsity was a matter essentially for the jury’s consideration. In criminal cases this court’s appellate jurisdiction is limited to matters of law alone, and the truth or falsity of a witness’ statement is essentially a matter of fact. It is possible that evidence might…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. State v. SquierNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API