People v. Meyer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the- opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
— The defendant is accused by information of petit larceny, and four previous convictions of petit larceny. On his arraignment, he pleaded not guilty of the petit larceny charged in the information, and confessed and pleaded guilty to the prior convictions.
*549The bill of exceptions recites: “At said trial, the clerk of the court, after having read the first part of the information, which charged the crime of petit larceny, as herein stated, was proceeding to read the second part, which charged the prior conviction, as above stated and set forth, when defendant’s counsel interposed an objection,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. CarltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HazletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Goeller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- People v. IsraelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. SherrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.