Legal Opinion
State v. Jojola
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1976No. 2518PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sodomy. Section 40A-9-7, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6), subsequently repealed. He asserts that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay evidence to show that the offenses occurred on the date charged — “on or about the 1st day of February, 1975”. We do not consider whether the evidence was inadmissible hearsay. The date of the offenses was established through testimony to which no objection was made and which was independent of the alleged hearsay evidence. The issues discussed are: (1) pre-indictment delay, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- United States v. Sylvester AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- State v. CrumpNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- State v. GrissomNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.