Legal Opinion
State v. Cervantes
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1979No. 3715PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Heroin and phencyclidine are controlled substances. Sections 30-31-6(B), N.M.S.A. 1978 (Supp.1978) and 30-31-8(B), N.M.S.A. 1978. Defendant appeals his convictions of three counts of trafficking in heroin and two counts of distribution of phencyclidine. Sections 30-31-20 and 30-31-22, N.M.S.A. 1978. We (1) answer four issues summarily and discuss (2) search and seizure claims and (3) evidence of conduct.
Issues Answered Summarily(a) Defendant made an insufficient showing to obtain dismissal on the basis of pre-indictment delay. State v. Duran, 91 N.M. 756, 581 P.2d 19…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. HogervorstNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. CordovaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Commonwealth v. Nine Hundred & Ninety-Two DollarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.