Legal Opinion
State v. Crump
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1971No. 9143PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of robbery, kidnapping, and an attempt to commit murder. He was sentenced for each offense, and he appealed. We reverse the judgment of conviction and sentence for kidnapping, but otherwise affirm.
Defendant first claims he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. This right is guaranteed by both the United States Constitution and the New Mexico Constitution. Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 87 S.Ct. 988, 18 L.Ed.2d 1 (1967); Raburn v. Nash, 78 N.M. 385, 431 P.2d 874 (1967); State v. Polsky, N.M. App., 82 N.M. 393, 482…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. UrbanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.