Legal Opinion
United States v. Jackson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1982No. 81-1094PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
The United States has noted an appeal pursuant to D.C.Code 1981, § 23-104(a)(l) 1 , from a pretrial ruling suppressing evidence. Appellee Jackson has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction because, he asserts, the United States Attorney has not certified in good faith that the evidence suppressed constitutes “substantial proof of the charge pending against defendant” and “that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay.” D.C.Code 1981, § 23-104(a)(l). We deny appellee’s motion to dismiss. 2
Jackson has been charged with first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New England Power Company v. Asiatic Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- United States v. HammondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- District of Columbia v. McConnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re F.K.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re J.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.