Legal Opinion

Adams v. Clements

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 7, 2002No. 160023841; A113367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, P. J.

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and the Department of Corrections appeal the grant of a writ of habeas corpus requiring the Lane County Sheriff to release petitioner from custody. The trial court held that, because petitioner’s sentence had expired, the Board did not have authority to revoke his parole and return him to custody. We reverse.

The Lane County Sheriff took petitioner into custody on September 6, 2000, because he possessed a controlled substance, because he was in contempt of court, and because the Board had revoked his parole. Petitioner sought administrative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gage v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Tiner v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Rossi v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Strawn v. BELLEQUECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API