Tiner v. Clements

In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, plaintiff alleges that Lane Comity indicted him for various crimes and that he filed a pretrial motion in the underlying criminal action to dismiss those charges arguing, in part, that he was being held in violation of Article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). The trial court denied the motion. Plaintiff then filed a petition for habeas corpus alleging that he was being held in violation of the IAD. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs habeas petition for failure to state a claim for relief, see ORS 34.680(1), and entered judgment…