Legal Opinion

AUO Corporation v. Trivale Technologies, LLC, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 16, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01739Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AUO CORPORATION, Case No. 26-cv-01739-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. STRIKE UNDER CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE; GRANTING TRIVALE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 32 Plaintiff AUO Corporation filed this action against Defendants Trivale Technologies, LLC and IPValue Management, Inc. The First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 30 (“FAC”)) seeks a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity as to ten patents (Claims 1 through 20, the “Declaratory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation and McDonald Systems of California, Inc. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API