Legal Opinion
Noble v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided June 11, 1997No. 3:96-cv-20046PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BREMER, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s resisted Motion for Summary Judgment. (Clerk’s No. 20).
Plaintiffs Michael and Kelly Noble filed this complaint on March 29, 1996, following Michael Noble’s discharge from employment with Defendant, Monsanto Company (Monsanto). Counts I, II, and III of the complaint pertain to Plaintiff Michael Noble. Count I alleges hostile-work-environment sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C, § 2000e et seq.; Count II…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. John v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Local 1010, Dist. 118, Local Lodge No. 254Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Twigland Fashions, Ltd. v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Moss v. Advance Circuits, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Frederick v. Simpson CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001
- Klein v. McGowanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.