Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 17, 2006No. 57, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this case, we must determine whether the trial court committed reversible error by refusing to permit appellant during cross-examination of the State’s medical expert to ask the expert whether his medical opinions concerning the victim’s injuries would change if he knew that appellant’s wife had written a letter indicating her intent to assert her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination if called to testify in the case. We shall hold that the trial court acted within its discretion in prohibiting this proposed line of cross-examination, and affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Ex parte IrvineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. State v. WhittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Furda v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API