Legal Opinion
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1984No. 83-677PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam'.
The scope of review applicable to this court when reviewing an order of the commission is set forth in R.C. 4903.13, which provides in pertinent part:
“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”
As stated in Columbus v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 103, 104 [12 O.O.3d 112]:
“Under the ‘unlawful or unreasonable’ standard specified in R.C. 4903.13, this court will not reverse or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- General Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988