Legal Opinion
W & D Acquisition, LLC v. First Union National Bank
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 2003No. SC 16657PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether, as a matter of law, a banking institution has until the “midnight deadline” described in General Statutes § 42a-4-104 (a) (10)2 to comply with garnishment process under General Statutes § 42a-4-303 (a).3 The
*706plaintiff, W & D Acquisition, LLC, claims that the duration of the “reasonable time” period in which to comply with garnishment process pursuant to § 42a-4-303 (a) is not defined by the midnight deadline, but is to be measured by a “reasonable time,” considering the facts of the case.4 We agree with the plaintiff and,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FaderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Tappin v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Smith v. YurkovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Thames Talent, Ltd. v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.