Demarest v. Broadhurst
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner
¶1 The Appellant, Roberta Demarest (Roberta), filed a Complaint in the Ninth Judicial District Court, Toole County, alleging that the Respondents, Paula Broadhurst (Paula) and Craig Broadhurst (Craig), breached an oral or implied bailment agreement. The District Court granted the Respondents’ motion for summary judgment concluding that, pursuant to § 27-2-202(3), MCA, the applicable period of limitation had expired and Roberta’s claim was barred. Roberta now appeals. We affirm.
¶2 The material facts in this matter are undisputed. Roberta was the owner of twenty horses and some tack. Ten of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Garden City Floral Co. v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1953
- Erickson v. CroftMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Akada v. PARK 12-01 CORPORATIONWashington Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Guest v. McLavertyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Dr. James Mungas v. Great FMontana Supreme Court · 2009