Bonaduce v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation case; claimant had been in the employ of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation since 1951; he was promoted on October 1954 to the job of “auxiliary engineer”. His ordinary duties consisted in “reading charts, placing charts, wiping, light work on engines and reporting pressures” to his superior. We will refer to these units of machinery as engines, as they are called in this record, although they in fact probably were compressors. Claimant’s duties also included keeping “Station 20”, which housed the machinery, clean and in order. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- McGowan v. Upper Darby Pet SupplySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Billick v. Republic Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Banas v. Eagle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.