Legal Opinion
Newport Steel Corp. v. Thompson
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 1, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-F-1808PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. The court has determined that the motions before the court are best considered as cross motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.
I
Newport Steel Corporation (“Newport”) manufactures steel pipe for drilling operations. C.G. Thompson (“Thompson”) serves as president of Peak Oilfield…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- In Re PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Leonard v. McMorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Pereira v. Grecogas Ltd. (In Re Saba Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Fostvedt v. United States, Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.