Closset v. Portland Amusement Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.
Appellants urge that plaintiff could not proceed against the defendants in one action because their liabilities are different and a different judgment was demanded against defendants Weinstein and Cohen from the judgment demanded against the other defendants. It is further argued that defendants Portland Amusement Co. and American Theatre Co. were liable as lessee and assignee while defendants Cohen and Weinstein, if liable at all, were liable on their bond guaranteeing the payment of the rent. There is no claim that defendant American Theatre Co. is not liable by the terms of the lease…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Askay v. MaloneyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Lowell v. Pendleton Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Harvey v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Swank v. MoisanOregon Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Ruby v. West Coast Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Grandy v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Abbott v. GrantIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Closset v. Portland Amusement Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.