Legal Opinion

Closset v. Portland Amusement Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1930Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied December 9, 1930.

On Petition eor Behearing

(293 P. 720)

Coshow, C. J.

The appealing defendants have presented an urgent petition for rehearing. Owing to the fact that the question involved is one of first impression the petition has had very careful examination. In the main the petition treats of matters that were decided after due consideration and the reasons for the decision are stated in the original opinion.

No case has been cited by appellants directly in support of their contention here. The case of Hayden v. Pearce, 33 Or. 89 (52 P. 1049), is not in point…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayden v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Closset v. Portland Amusement Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ruble v. Coyote G. & S. M. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Franklin v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API