Legal Opinion
People v. Dolan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 26, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment of conviction rendered July 9, 1999 affirmed.
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review, since defendant merely moved for a general trial order of dismissal and did not raise the alleged insufficiencies now urged on appeal (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, were we to review, we would find that the driving element of the driving while intoxicated offenses here charged was established beyond a reasonable doubt by credited prosecution testimony that moments after the vehicular collision…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BoodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. SaplinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ChanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- People v. ClinkscalesNew York District Court · 2004
- People v. LopezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
- People v. WalkerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. Martinez-GuzmanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2012