Geiger v. Uninsured Employers' Fund
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Appellant Joseph Geiger (Geiger) appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Court’s judgment dated August 22, 2001, where the Workers’ Compensation Court ruled that Geiger was not an employee at the time of his injury and therefore was not entitled to compensation from the Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF). We affirm.
¶2 Geiger presents the following three issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in concluding that David Deckert d/b/a David Deckert Trucking was not an “employer” as defined by § 39-71-117(1) and (4), MCA (1997)?
¶4 2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Turjan v. Valley View EstatesMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- General Mills, Inc. v. Zerbe Bros., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hiett v. Missoula County Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. StiffarmMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Simms v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Hand v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Boster v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.