Legal Opinion

NCNB National Bank of North Carolina v. Gutridge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8830SC1049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

I. Plaintiff’s Claim

Defendants assign error to the trial court’s granting plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. In evaluating a motion for directed verdict, the non-movant’s evidence must be taken as true and all inconsistencies in the evidence resolved in the non-movant’s favor. Morris v. Bruney, 78 N.C. App. 668, 338 S.E. 2d 561 (1986). The standard is whether the evidence so considered is sufficient to submit the case to the jury. Hitchcock v. Cullerton, 82 N.C. App. 296, 346 S.E. 2d 215 (1986).

The evidence presented at trial to the effect that defendant Roy Gutridge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Hutchens v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Morris v. BruneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Hitchcock v. CullertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  2. Baldwin v. GTE South, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Philson v. Cold Creek Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Mountain Farm Credit Service v. Purina Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Baldwin v. GTE South, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API