Baldwin v. GTE South, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
On 1 October 1991, the trial court ruled, in limine, that a Department of Transportation regulation prohibiting placement of commercial telephone booths in rights-of-way was a safety regulation. The court also ruled that pedestrians using such installations are within the class of persons protected by the regulation. At trial, GTE South moved for a directed verdict both at the end of plaintiffs evidence and at the close of all evidence. Both motions were denied. During its charge, the court instructed the jury on the issue of negligence per se.
Although defendant sets forth seven…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Hutchens v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gregory v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Mosteller v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Williams v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Baldwin v. GTE South, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Gregory v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002