Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Cullerton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8518SC1388PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

The plaintiff instituted this action for malicious prosecution seeking to recover damages of $20,250.00 from the defendant. At trial the plaintiff presented evidence tending to show that on 25 June 1982 plaintiff and defendant, his neighbor, engaged in a verbal exchange concerning plaintiff’s construction of a fence on his property which abutted the defendant’s property. Subsequent to the exchange plaintiff was arrested on a warrant sworn out by the defendant alleging that plaintiff “did unlawfully and willfully threaten to physically injure the person of Kathleen A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Jones v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Tripp v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Taylor v. . HodgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Farmer v. ChaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Becker v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Stead-Bowers v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Wilson v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API