Legal Opinion

Linquist v. Bowen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1988No. Nos. 86-1486, 86-1790 and 86-2075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

In Linguist v. Bowen, 813 F.2d 884 (8th Cir.1987), this court upheld the district court’s decision in a nationwide class action concerning the provisions under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 301-1397f (1982) and the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 231-231v (1982) that each required an offset against an individual’s benefits of fifty cents for each dollar the individual earned in excess of the exempt amount. The plaintiff class asserted that retired persons covered by both Acts should have their benefits reduced by only a single fifty-percent offset even though…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Felton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  2. McDonald v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  3. Johnson v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Linquist v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API