Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1991No. 89-2853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

939 F.2d 586

Karen JOHNSON and Dorothy Pearson, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants,

v.

The UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT (HUD); Jack Kemp, in his official capacity as

Secretary of HUD; Southern Commercial Bank, a Missouri

banking organization; Hillvale Associates, a Missouri

limited partnership; Medve-Wald Partnership, a Missouri

limited partnership; Rodan Management, Inc., a Missouri

corporation, Appellees.

No. 89-2853.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

July 22, 1991.

Ann B. Lever, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

David T.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Felton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  2. Rosenbaum v. MacAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. ROSENBAUM v. MacALLISTERCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours and Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2002
  5. Karen Gordon v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API