Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1991No. 89-2853Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

This matter is before the court upon plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees in connection with their successful appeal in Johnson v. HUD, 911 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir.1990), rev’g 724 F.Supp. 1257 (E.D.Mo.1989). Plaintiffs seek attorney’s fees from the federal defendants under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1), and from the private defendants under the common, or substantial, benefit exception to the American Rule. For the reasons discussed below, we deny plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees on appeal.

*588In Johnson v. HUD this court held that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API