Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Judd v. Cooney

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1934No. 7,293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an application for a writ of mandate, filed in this court by permission because of its public character.

The Twenty-Second Legislative Assembly enacted Chapter 23 (Laws 1931, p. 67), authorizing the state board of examiners to issue and sell refunding bonds of the state of Montana for the purpose of providing funds to pay and redeem all that portion of Series A and Series B of the educational bonds of the state of Montana, issued as of July 1, 1921, pursuant to sale by the state under the provisions of Initiative Measure No. 19, enacted by the people of the state of Montana at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hotchkiss v. MarionMontana Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Philipsburg v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Toole County Irrigation District v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Olsen v. SwanbergMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. DunhamMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API