Legal Opinion

Curran v. Eberharter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1987No. 01086 and 01112PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is a cross appeal from the grant of defendant Herman P. Eberharter’s (“Eberharter”) motion for judgment n.o.v. Finding no error in the trial court’s ruling, we affirm the judgment.

Background

Upon review of the grant of a motion for judgment n.o.v., all of the evidence, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, must be viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict winner. Northwest Savings Assoc. v. Distler, 354 Pa.Super. 187, 511 A.2d 824 (1986). Using this standard, the evidence adduced at trial can be summarized as follows.

The cause of action against Eberharter for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Straup v. Times HeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Central Dauphin School District v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Northwest Savings Ass'n v. DistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Paul v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. TomlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Keystone Filler & Mfg. Co. v. American Mining InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Doppler v. DopplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. McConnell v. BerkheimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Mele v. OlivaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API