Legal Opinion
Belmont Abbey College v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 18, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, employers are required to offer group health-insurance plans that cover certain forms of preventive care without charging a co-payment. For example, the Act mandates that group health plans pay in full for all FDA-approved contraceptive services sought by plan participants, including sterilization procedures, emergency oral contraception (such as the “morning-after” pill), and counseling for women of reproductive age. The Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury, and…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Legatus v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Akiachak Native Community v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Conference of State Bank Supervisors v. Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Wheaton College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.