Legal Opinion
Legatus v. Sebelius
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 31, 2012No. Case No. 12-12061PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS DANIEL WEINGARTZ’S AND WEINGARTZ SUPPLY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF LEGATUS’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Legatus, Daniel Weingartz, and Weingartz Supply Company, all adherents to the tenets of Roman Catholicism, move for a preliminary injunction under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They each seek to enjoin the Government from enforcing the provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that requires all group health plans, other than *985those…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Conestoga Wood Specialities Corp. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Roman Catholic Diocese v. SebeliusDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.