Legal Opinion
Francorp, Inc. v. Siebert
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 13, 2001No. 00 C 1248PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Francorp initially alleged that defendants Mark Siebert (Siebert), Tommy D. Payne (Payne), Dan Levy (Levy), Laurie Ludes (Ludes), and Judy Janusz (Janusz) left Francorp to form a competing company, defendant Mark Siebert & Associates, Inc. (MSA), d/b/a the iFranchise Group (iFranchise), in violation of copyright, contract, and tort law. MSA responded with a three-count counterclaim. 1 We have addressed several motions for partial summary judgment in three prior opinions. See Francorp, Inc. v. Siebert, 126 F.Supp.2d 543…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Civility Experts Worldwide v. Molly Manners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Meier v. MusburgerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Mist-On Systems, Inc. v. Gilley's European Tan SpaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- Doorage Inc. v. Blue Crates LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Mist-On Systems, Inc. v. Gilley's European Tan SpaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2002